We haven’t been watching a lot of movies lately, since we were getting ready for our ragin’ housewarming party. It raged, it was great, but we really needed a weekend off. Yesterday morning we decided to watch The Bridge on the River Kwai. When we were done with that, we played the “What do you wanna do, I don’t know, what do you wanna do” game and decided to dive right into Gigi. And then when we were finished with that, clearly the only thing that could be done was to start up Ben-Hur.
All spectacle, all the time, people. But boy, who knew spectacle came in so many flavors?
So The Bridge on the River Kwai. This is one of my dad’s favorites, so I’ve seen it many times. I haven’t sat through the whole thing in over ten years, though, probably because I had this idea that it’s really long and drawn out. Yeah, it’s long (2 and a half hours), but not that long. And there are scenes that stretch out and go on and on and on, but there’s not a second of wasted film. Everything David Lean wants you to see, he shows you, and you have to feel everything for yourself. There’s not a lot of talking, and the action scenes aren’t underscored. The scene near the end where the demolitions team is sneaking in to wire up the bridge is scored with only the rushing of the river and the breathing of the actors, and it’s absolutely riveting.
Everybody on the planet, I’m sure, has seen a clip of the climax where the bridge explodes and the train goes off the cliff, which is mind-blowing, but if you’ve watched the previous two hours and fifteen minutes of setup, you realize this movie isn’t a spectacle at all, it’s not even an epic. It’s an intensely personal story about two men who both have the tragic inability to see anything other than absolutes, which inevitably causes a literal and figurative train wreck.
Gigi, on the other hand, is spectacle, and I know a couple of you are going to gasp in horror here, but I’d never seen this before. And if that offends you, stop now, because I am about to confess something else. (Are you gone?) Okay, I was stunned to decide that I didn’t really like it. Of course I adored Maurice Chevalier and Hermione Gingold, Leslie Caron was enchanting, and duh, how can you go wrong with Cecil Beaton and Lerner and Lowe? But it’s all so…cluttery. The set of Gigi’s grandmother’s apartment with the red wallpaper and the Victorian knick-knacks made me want to gouge my eyeballs out after about an hour. The story seemed to lack focus, and the constant reprises of songs just annoyed me. Worst of all, it was so predictable and obvious. Yack. I am desperately trying not to skip ahead to watch My Fair Lady, to which this hugely pales in comparison.
And now to the surprise hit of the weekend, Ben-Hur. I know I’ve never seen this before in one sitting. Both Nathan and I have always lumped this movie in with all those other Biblical epics, such as the loathsome Ten Commandments. All I really knew about this movie was that there’s an awesome chariot race, and it’s got that guy from the NRA in it, and they play it on the TV at Easter time and it’s got something to do with Jesus, who cures some lepers or something. I was expecting a bloated, over-produced, preachy extravaganza featuring the horrendous over-acting of said Mr. Heston, whom, I was shocked to find out took Best Actor this year. I was prepared to loathe this.
Well, put me in a dress and call me Sally. Ben-Hur isn’t mindless DeMille-esque spectacle! It’s a frakking William Wyler film! It isn’t all about Jesus! And Charlton Heston is fabulous! Who knew? I don’t even know where to start. Okay, let’s start with the scene I’d seen before, the breathakingly exciting chariot race. I was at my parents’ house this Easter and they were half-watching Ben-Hur on their tiny little TV, but when the chariot scene came on, they stopped and watched it, so I had to, too. And I was thinking, yawn, oh, boy, it’s a spectacle, Charlton Heston is in a chariot race with some mustache-twirling bad guy with knives on his wheels just like in the drag race in Grease. But guess what? It’s not a mustache-twirling bad guy. It’s a really, really good person who has made some terrible choices and has gone horribly down the wrong path. But it gets better than that. NONE of the villians, not even Pontius Pilate, KNOWN bad guy, is portrayed as one-dimensionally evil. These Romans have a a job to do, and they’re doing what they have to do because they’re doing what they think is right. It’s fascinating to watch.
I thought this film was going to be all about a story, and it turned out to be about people, and every person in it seemed very real. Everyone made choices, good and bad, some changed their minds, some didn’t. I’m delighted that I changed mine. (And Charlton Heston has a smokin’ bod. I’m just sayin’.)